Tiger Woods' 2000-2009 Dominance. . . .

Great observation by ESPN's Jason Sobel on his twitter feed:

@JasonSobel: Tiger Woods led the PGA Tour with 121 top-10s this decade. Three more than No. 2 man Vijay Singh . . . in 95 fewer starts.

So, I thought I'd do a little research into the subject . . .

Tiger Woods:
       2009 - 17 events, 14 top-10s, 6 wins
       2008 - 6 events, 6 top-10s, 4 wins
       2007 - 16 events, 12 top-10s, 7 wins
       2006 - 15 events, 11 top-10s, 8 wins
       2005 - 21 events, 13 top-10s, 6 wins
       2004 - 19 events, 14 top-10s, 1 win
       2003 - 18 events, 12 top-10s, 5 wins
       2002 - 18 events, 13 top-10s, 5 wins
       2001 - 19 events, 9 top-10s, 5 wins
       2000 - 20 events, 17 top-10s, 9 wins

      * 121 top-10s in 169 starts (72 percent), 54 wins (32 percent)

Phil Mickelson
      2009 - 18 events, 7 top-10s, 3 wins
      2008 - 21 events, 8 top-10s, 2 wins
      2007 - 22 events, 7 top-10s, 3 wins
      2006 - 19 events, 8 top-10s, 2 wins
      2005 - 21 events, 9 top-10s, 4 wins
      2004 - 22 events, 13 top-10s, 2 wins
      2003 - 23 events, 7 top-10s, 0 wins
      2002 - 26 events, 12 top-10s, 2 wins
      2001 - 23 events, 13 top-10s, 2 wins
      2000 - 23 events, 12-tops 10s, 4 wins

      * 96 top-10s in 218 stars (44 percent), 24 wins (11 percent)

Vijay Singh
     2009 - 21 events, 3 top-10s, 0 wins
     2008 - 23 events, 8 top-10s, 3 wins
     2007 - 27 events, 7 top-10s, 2 wins
     2006 - 27 events, 13 top-10s, 1 win
     2005 - 30 events, 18 top-10s, 4 wins
     2004 - 29 events, 18 top-10s, 9 wins
     2003 - 27 events, 18 top-10s, 4 wins
     2002 - 28 events, 11 top-10s, 2 wins
     2001 - 26 events, 14 top-10s, 0 wins
     2000 - 26 events, 8 top-10s, 1 win

    * 118 top-10s in 264 starts (45 percent), 26 wins (10 percent)

Jack Nicklaus:
      1962 - 26 events, 16 top-10s, 3 wins
      1963 - 25 events, 17 top-10s, 5 wins
      1964 - 26 events, 17 top-10s, 4 wins
      1965 - 24 events, 20 top-10s, 5 wins
      1966 - 19 events, 13 top-10s, 3 wins
      1967 - 23 events, 15 top-10s, 5 wins
      1968 - 22 events, 13 top-10s, 2 wins
      1969 - 23 events, 11 top-10s, 3 wins
      1970 - 19 events, 12 top-10s, 2 wins
      1971 - 18 events, 15 top-10s, 5 wins

      * 149 top-10s in 225 starts (66 percent), 37 wins (16 percent)

Lessons learned:

- Tiger simply dominated the PGA Tour in the 2000s. Consider how often he won -- 32 percent of the time . . . are you kidding me?

- Don't ever say that Nicklaus dominated more than Tiger did; just compare the numbers. Oh, by the way, I chose Jack's best 10 year period of his career.

Side note:
 I wanted to compare the figures against Arnold Palmer, Sam Snead, and Ben Hogan but I was unable to find adequate statistics. If anybody finds them, send me a link.

Statistics via: PGA Tour & Nicklaus

Stop hating on Phil. . .

Jason Sobel, who I will be interviewing tomorrow, blogged yesterday about the potential Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson rivalry which may unfold this year:

"That leaves Mickelson, one of the most accomplished players in the game's history who often receives criticism simply for the fact that he isn't Tiger Woods. At his best, though, Lefty can hang with his adversary on any given Sunday, as evidenced by victories at the Tour Championship two months ago and the WGC-HSBC Champions tournament this past weekend in China."


"He has now finished off the 2009 campaign playing his best golf since winning back-to-back titles at the BellSouth Classic and Masters three-and-a-half years ago, if not the best golf of his career. Thanks to assistance with the forward-press putting stroke from two-time major winner Dave Stockton, Mickelson is rolling his rock with the utmost confidence -- something he can only hope remains during the offseason."


Though many are quick to criticize Mickelson, he truly has been Tiger's most formidable opponent throughout the last decade. While he's battled inconsistency, off-the-course circumstances, and a seeming reputation as one who folds under pressure, he continues to prove his mastery at times.


But, there are a few certainties about Mickelson which the golfing community fails to fully acknowledge:


1) Mickelson is every bit as physically talented as any one to have ever played the game. (Here, Here, or Here). He has an uncanny sense for trickery and short-game mastery -- although, interestingly, his technique is noticeably different to that of Woods (Tiger v. Phil).


2) Mickelson's golf career has been filled with as much success as almost anyone in history. 


College/Amateur - (won 16 college events, 1990 Porter Cup, 4-time first-team All American, 3 NCAA Individual Champions, 3 Haskins  Awards, 1990 US Amateur, Won 1991 PGA Tour event as an amateur)


Professional (45 wins, 3 majors)


3) His game is better today than it ever has been. . . 


A few years ago I spoke with a friend and former teammate of Mickelson's at Arizona State. Ironically, we had dinner the night that Mickelson lost the U.S. Open at Winged Foot.


**Phil's 18th debacle starts at the 3:30 mark.

Phil's former teammate spoke of how even in college Phil had tendencies to play overly brash at the end of competition. My favorite anectode from the night concerned Phil's idea of shaping shots. When trying to either draw or fade a ball, the major focus needs to be in three regards: one) what line does the shot need to start on, two) what line do I want the ball to end up curving to, and three) is it more essential to start the ball on line and over/under curve the shot (say, when trying to curve it out of trees and you want to make certain that you don't hit a tree) or to make certain that the shot curves in its intended direction (say, when curving the ball away from a hazard).


Phil, as evident in the 18th hole at Winged Foot (and, truthfully, throughout his career) has struggled with this at times, perhaps focusing too much on executing the "perfect shot."


As a junior golfer, I was fortunate to attend a banquet for the 2004 U.S. Open which featured Arnold Palmer, Phil Mickelson, and was hosted by Jim Nantz (I blogged about it last month). While in the audience, I was offered an opportunity to ask Phil and Mr. Palmer a question. I asked them to comment on their shared aggressive playing style -- this was during the time that Tiger was battling off the tee (not that he still doesn't at times) and was playing with unbelievable conservatism. Phil made a joke, and Palmer told a wonderful story. Obviously, I find ways to tell that story often -- but I'm always certain to include that Phil was a true gentleman. I attended the banquet because Rolex, who hosted it, had invited the top juniors from the area (AJGA members). Phil, who has the most decorated AJGA career in history, spoke directly to a group of us candidly and sincerely -- he told us how he had never believed that he would accomplish all that he had and that one of us would one day play against him on Tour.


As someone with a vested intrinsic interest in Tiger Wood's history breaking career, at times I want Phil to come into his own for no purpose other than providing Tiger with that single formidable opponent which some overzealous commentators seem to use as a condemnation of Tiger's greatness.


Look forward to this PGA season. Tiger is going to be better this year than he ever has before, as will Phil, there's a generation of young players who are blossoming, and there's the old guard that isn't ready to go silently into the night.


-Michael


P.S. Check out Geoff Shackelford's excellent post on Tiger Woods and his golf course design business.
Photo(s):