My proposal: "www.pgatour.com/tour-zone"

As I enjoyed the Thanksgiving break and reflected on upcoming career conversations I'm hoping for, I spent a truly embarrassing amount of time playing with the Twitter application "Echofon" on my iPhone. For the dual followers of my @Michaelott23 twitter account and "Never Three Putt," you'll undoubtedly attest to the bombardment of tweets you got from me; although many of them were about European soccer.

Regardless, I noticed the --bordering on addict level-- twittering going on by some Tour stars; most noticeably Bubba Watson, Trevor Immelman, Paula Creamer, and Ian Poulter (future Tour star Rickie Fowler is worth mentioning as well). While their tweets ranged from Paula Creamer (and I'm not being misogynistic) talking about her new hair style, Bubba Watson talking about his Thanksgiving day charity work and religious services, to Trevor Immelman's fan hood of the Orlando Magic, each Tour star brought an interesting component to the twitter and social media world.


On Twitter, I currently follow:

Grame McDowell (@Grame_McDowell), Jamie Lovemark (@jamielovemark), Rich Beem (@richbeem), Kevin Streelman (@Streels54), Natalie Gulbis (@natalie_gulbis), Stewart Cink (@stewartcink), PGA Tour (@pgatour), Suzann Pettersen (@suzannpettersen), Annika Sorenstam (@annika59), Davis Love III (@Love3d), Geoff Ogilvy (@geoffogilvy), Trevor Immelman (@trevorimmelman), Paul Casey (@Paul_Casey), Peter Jacobsen (@Jake Trout), Chris DiMarco (@ChrisDiMarco), Brittany Lincicome (@Brittany1golf), Bubba Watson (@bubbawatson), Rickie Fowler (@rickiefowlerPGA), Rory McIlroy (@rorsmcilroy), John Daly (@PGA_JohnDaly), and more . . .

While at times I may over-discuss the Twitter phenomenon, its symbolic powers of transparency and fan-courtship are undeniable. Twitter is not alone in its powers from the social media world: Facebook, personal websites, video blogging, etc. each bring similar, but distinct, notions to the athlete/fan relationship.

With that said, my recommendation for a capitalization by the PGA Tour on social media, and similar online exclusive, player driven content is a sub-site to the PGA Tour's web site: "www.pgatour.com/tour-zone."

Create the exclusive home for Internet content created exclusively by PGA Tour stars. Just as I have on the upper-part of the right-hand column on "Never Three Putt," the site would have RSS feeds of the Twitter accounts of PGA Tour stars, links to their personal web sites, their Facebook accounts. That's the easy and perhaps most powerful part; providing a well-detailed access for fans to their favorite golfer's social media.

The next component would be an online diary and online video blog.

Each week, one to as many as is appropriate PGA Tour star would devote time to online blogging (100-300 word posts) perhaps as many as three times a day (before the round, after the round, and again in the evening). The posts would not need to be scholarly or literary works, but rather a brief, even run-on sentence of what the golfer is doing to prepare, where they had dinner, their thoughts on the round, what they worked on at the range afterward, what they were going to watch on television, etc.. Obviously these posts could be edited and uploaded by a single PGA Tour employee -- and probably should be.

For a video blog, one tour player would be selected each week and a single PGA Tour employee would shadow them and shoot raw footage to be uploaded to the site. While there may be some editing for fluidness and quality control, the raw nature of the video blog would be its most appealing attribute.

I hope everyone enjoyed the holiday.

Look for a detailed post this week concerning the Nationwide Tour's eligibiliy requirements and field composition.

Do not look for a detailed post or commentary this week on the Tiger Woods saga. I have always disclosed my affinity for him; that he has been nothing short of a hero to me, and I adamantly refuse to comment on speculation -- particularly because it involves matters that are none of my business.

I'll be posting later today on a social media/player visibility proposal I have for the PGA Tour.

Lag it closer to the hole, assuming you're still playing golf. . .

-Michael

For those who follow me on twitter, sorry for the recent troubles.
Not sure why, but Twitter decided to revert me back to my old user name.

I've now updated the account and changed names, I can now be found @michaelott23

Tiger Woods' 2000-2009 Dominance. . . .

Great observation by ESPN's Jason Sobel on his twitter feed:

@JasonSobel: Tiger Woods led the PGA Tour with 121 top-10s this decade. Three more than No. 2 man Vijay Singh . . . in 95 fewer starts.

So, I thought I'd do a little research into the subject . . .

Tiger Woods:
       2009 - 17 events, 14 top-10s, 6 wins
       2008 - 6 events, 6 top-10s, 4 wins
       2007 - 16 events, 12 top-10s, 7 wins
       2006 - 15 events, 11 top-10s, 8 wins
       2005 - 21 events, 13 top-10s, 6 wins
       2004 - 19 events, 14 top-10s, 1 win
       2003 - 18 events, 12 top-10s, 5 wins
       2002 - 18 events, 13 top-10s, 5 wins
       2001 - 19 events, 9 top-10s, 5 wins
       2000 - 20 events, 17 top-10s, 9 wins

      * 121 top-10s in 169 starts (72 percent), 54 wins (32 percent)

Phil Mickelson
      2009 - 18 events, 7 top-10s, 3 wins
      2008 - 21 events, 8 top-10s, 2 wins
      2007 - 22 events, 7 top-10s, 3 wins
      2006 - 19 events, 8 top-10s, 2 wins
      2005 - 21 events, 9 top-10s, 4 wins
      2004 - 22 events, 13 top-10s, 2 wins
      2003 - 23 events, 7 top-10s, 0 wins
      2002 - 26 events, 12 top-10s, 2 wins
      2001 - 23 events, 13 top-10s, 2 wins
      2000 - 23 events, 12-tops 10s, 4 wins

      * 96 top-10s in 218 stars (44 percent), 24 wins (11 percent)

Vijay Singh
     2009 - 21 events, 3 top-10s, 0 wins
     2008 - 23 events, 8 top-10s, 3 wins
     2007 - 27 events, 7 top-10s, 2 wins
     2006 - 27 events, 13 top-10s, 1 win
     2005 - 30 events, 18 top-10s, 4 wins
     2004 - 29 events, 18 top-10s, 9 wins
     2003 - 27 events, 18 top-10s, 4 wins
     2002 - 28 events, 11 top-10s, 2 wins
     2001 - 26 events, 14 top-10s, 0 wins
     2000 - 26 events, 8 top-10s, 1 win

    * 118 top-10s in 264 starts (45 percent), 26 wins (10 percent)

Jack Nicklaus:
      1962 - 26 events, 16 top-10s, 3 wins
      1963 - 25 events, 17 top-10s, 5 wins
      1964 - 26 events, 17 top-10s, 4 wins
      1965 - 24 events, 20 top-10s, 5 wins
      1966 - 19 events, 13 top-10s, 3 wins
      1967 - 23 events, 15 top-10s, 5 wins
      1968 - 22 events, 13 top-10s, 2 wins
      1969 - 23 events, 11 top-10s, 3 wins
      1970 - 19 events, 12 top-10s, 2 wins
      1971 - 18 events, 15 top-10s, 5 wins

      * 149 top-10s in 225 starts (66 percent), 37 wins (16 percent)

Lessons learned:

- Tiger simply dominated the PGA Tour in the 2000s. Consider how often he won -- 32 percent of the time . . . are you kidding me?

- Don't ever say that Nicklaus dominated more than Tiger did; just compare the numbers. Oh, by the way, I chose Jack's best 10 year period of his career.

Side note:
 I wanted to compare the figures against Arnold Palmer, Sam Snead, and Ben Hogan but I was unable to find adequate statistics. If anybody finds them, send me a link.

Statistics via: PGA Tour & Nicklaus

What to do without Tiger Woods . . .

VIEWERSHIP OF PGA TOURNAMENTS MISSED BY TIGER WOODS DUE TO INJURY IN 2008-09 (via: Nielsen)

TOURNAMENT	NETWORK	# OF VIEWERS P2+, 2007-08	# OF VIEWERS P2+, 2008-09	% CHANGE
BRITISH OPEN-SAT	ABC	3,040,000	3,278,000	7.8%
BRITISH OPEN-SUN	ABC	5,147,000	4,463,000	-13.3%
AT&T NATIONAL-SAT	CBS	2,630,000	1,442,000	-45.2%
AT&T NATIONAL-SUN	CBS	3,615,000	2,164,000	-40.1%
NEC WORLD SERIES GOLF-SAT	CBS	3,250,000	1,793,000	-44.8%
NEC WORLD SERIES GOLF-SUN	CBS	**4,541,000	3,018,000	-33.5%
PGA CHAMPIONSHIPS-SAT	CBS	5,947,000	^^1,298,000	-78.2%
PGA CHAMPIONSHIPS-SUN	CBS	**9,165,000	3,885,000	-57.6%
BUICK INV PGA GOLF-SAT	CBS	3,761,000	1,601,000	-57.4%
BUICK INV PGA GOLF-SUN	CBS	**6,193,000	2,868,000	-53.7%
DEUTSCHE GOLF CHAMP-SUN	NBC	3,658,000	1,960,000	-46.4%
DEUTSCHE GOLF CHAMP-MON	NBC	4,936,000	2,116,000	-57.1%
BMW GOLF CHAMPIONSHIP-SAT	NBC	3,113,000	1,091,000	-65.0%
BMW GOLF CHAMPIONSHIP-SUN	NBC	**4,358,000	1,678,000	-61.5%
TOUR CHAMPIONSHIP-SAT	NBC	3,573,000	1,372,000	-61.6%
TOUR CHAMPIONSHIP-SUN	NBC	**4,231,000	2,183,000	-48.4%
TOTAL		4,567, 000	2,430,000	-46.8%
source: The Nielsen Company 2009 ** – tournament won by Tiger Woods ^^ – play suspended by inclement weather

As anyone who followed golf during the 2008-09 season can attest, the noticeable lack in the intensity of media coverage of the PGA Tour, the lack in water-cooler discussions about the PGA Tour, and the general dwindled interest of professional golf were directly caused by an absence of the world's number one player, who happens to be the world's most popular athlete, the world's first athlete-billionaire, and one of the world's most recognizable people.

But, none of this is news. 

As someone who came of age in the Tiger-era, witnessing, firsthand, the impact that he had on a generation of young golfers has been profound.

Where I started playing golf perhaps before I could stand, watching, as a child, as my friends became intrigued by the game, began to notice the game -- I should say notice Tiger -- and began to take an interest in a game so long associated with everything non-progressive and non-youthful. As a generation of fist-pumping golfers emerged, so did an obvious resentment from the golfing status quo. Where much of the ambivalence surrounding Tiger has since disappeared, at times a certain negative cloud surrounds him -- whether it's racial considerations, doubting his accomplishments as he's never faced, what many consider, a single formidable opponent (Hogan vs. Snead, Nicklaus v. Palmer, etc.), or questions regarding the contemporary, distance-driven characterizations of golf (while some say this is a transmogrification of the game, I consider it progress).

Yet, as golf's popularity has seemingly dwindled over the past few years, a certain question has arisen, at least in my mind. What is golf going to do when Tiger is no longer able to capture the world's youth?

In ten years, Tiger will be 44-years-old and, at least in the opinion of some, he will likely continue his worldwide dominance of the game. But, it's doubtful that Tiger will remain the imposing force in drawing new (young) golf fans that he currently is (although, arguably, he's already lost some of his allure). What 14-year-old is going to idolize a 44-year-old?

My question, and the basic premise behind much of the conversation on this blog, is how is the PGA Tour going to reestablish a youthful audience without Tiger -- someone that has escalated the PGA Tour greater than anyone before him, with the possible exception of Arnold Palmer?

Is Ricky Fowler, Anthony Kim, Jamie Lovemark, or Rory McIlroy going to fill his shoes?

This is a conversation that golf's leading institutions need to have.

It is my belief that the advents of technology in the media are going to prove to be the greatest tools in golf's arsenal, assuming that golf embraces them. Today, golf needs to establish young stars that are, at least in a small possibility, able to serve as a fan's "favorite golfer." These young stars need to have their characters established throughout the golfing community; they need to not have yachts named "Privacy,"they need to provide an unlimited access to their fans, and they need to embrace stardom in a fashion that both the young and old, progressive and conservative can invest themselves in.

Twitterific (Update)

Great example of corporate golf twitter use yesterday:

@nikegolf http://pic.gd/7e0f78 @suzannpettersen testing the Nike Method Putter, it reduced her skid distance by 3" as compared to her current gamer

Combining both the specifics of how the Nike Method Putter improved Suzann Pettersen's roll with the putter and providing insight into LPGA Tour star Suzann Pettersen, this type of tweet should, literally, serve as a paradigm for future corporate golf twitter use.

I was disappointed to see that Suzann Pettersen did not follow up on her Twitter account with any reference to the putter, although she did inform her followers that she would be spending the day with the Nike Golf department.

Well played Nike . . .

Anything less would be unexpected from the powerhouse that is Nike.

Twitterific

Last month, Ron Sirak published an excellent article on the use of Twitter by professional golfers. His major contention was:

"The main benefit players derive from Twitter is an immediate connection with their fans. This can also provide another platform on which to promote the various goods and services with which they have lucrative endorsement deals. That makes both the player and the sponsor happy, and it helps cement the bond between the player and the fan. The tweets help to humanize the celebrity."

With the advances of social media, individuals, corporations, and organizations are increasingly able to provide transparency for their constituency (fans). Traditionally, public relations practitioners strive to control the frame in which their organization is viewed; to manipulate, exploit, and portray their organization in a light that best advances a respective cause. In the case of individuals, the ability to send exact, well-conceived messages to an audience permits one to establish a lens for a constituency to view them through; a "cyber-personality" of sorts.



Ultimately, the content of a "tweet" isn't entirely significant, as long as it provides some sort of insight into a golfer's life that a fan wouldn't have access to otherwise. Rather, its significance lies within the perception that an audience gains from it.

For instance, yesterday evening PGA Tour player Bubba Watson (@bubbawatson) tweeted:

Meow a chip n on the plane! #yourwelcome ;-) http://tweetreel.com/?nmaxm

Not only does his "tweet" entail a comical video, but it's equally an advertisement for NetJets.


Similarly, LPGA sensation Michelle Wie (@themichellewie) tweeted after her recent victory:

wooooOoooooooooohooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

She's also kept her fans up to date with her injured ankle:

Thank you all for your support. I was so sad to pull out from this tournament. I am going to go to my doctor tomorrow to get it checked out

Off to la to see my doctor today and take some Mris and scans. Wish me luck... Then I'm off to Stanford for the big game!! Cheeeheeee

Over the last five years, perhaps no athlete in this country has been vilified to the extent that Michelle Wie has. In her precarious position of maintaining the youthful exuberance which has brought her fame since she was 13 while balancing the desire to portray herself as a mature competitor, it seems that Twitter allows for this dueling proclivity.


I also found a list of the golfers using Twitter.

I can be found on twitter at Michael_R_Ott


Photo(s): Twitter

Monday Morning Reader

John Huggan writes an excellent, classic golf-essay, (Rory) "McIlroy's decision to play two tours is a risky strategy"

GIVEN HIS endearingly mop-topped combination of jauntiness, natural charisma and respectful politeness that is a credit to his rightfully proud parents, it has never been hard to like and admire Rory McIlroy. But this past week that already less than onerous task got even easier. 

On top of the prodigious physical gifts that produce his beautifully natural and rhythmic action and a subsequent array of shots superior to perhaps everyone except that Tiger fellow, the Belfast boy revealed a powerful strength of character that can only augur well for his future.

Against the advice of his manager and at least three vastly more experienced players, the 20-year-old officially announced his intention to join the PGA Tour next year.
"I want to challenge myself against the best," confirms McIlroy, who today may well become the winner of the inaugural "Race to Dubai" and so don the mantle of Europe's number one golfer for 2009. "The only way to do that is by playing in the best fields possible. I think I'll become a better player by playing a bit more over there. I'll be playing with better players and obviously you can learn a bit from that."

While duly respectful and betraying not a whit of boastfulness, that is a comment containing more than a hint of steel. This, one suspects, is a man with the self-belief to not only take on Tiger but, at least occasionally, beat him. To which the world's best player will no doubt counter: "bring it on."

Anyway, starting at the WGC Accenture Match Play Championship in February, McIlroy will play a maximum of 17 times on the PGA Tour next year. His schedule contains only blue-chip tournaments like Arnold Palmer's Bay Hill Invitational, Jack Nicklaus' Memorial Tournament, the Players' Championship, the three US majors, the World Golf Championships and, providing he plays to his own and everyone else's high expectations, the four Fed-Ex Cup play-off events. Over that feast of goodies he will sprinkle a few visits to the European Tour that will remain his home.

Jay Busbee compiles "The 10 Worst Golf Chokes of the 2000s"

Connell Barrett (golf.com) writes a, almost funny, "Top 5 'Seinfeld,' 'Curb' golf Moments" tribute.

Jason Sobel (ESPN.com) tweets:

@JasonSobel Lee Westwood called his Dubai win "the biggest moment of my golfing career." Bigger than those missed putts to join playoffs at two majors?

Thanksgiving Day Post Preview

Friends,

While I'm typically of the school that Thanksgiving only presents an opportunity to drink massive amounts of wine and consume absurd amounts of food before 3:00p.m., I'd like to open "Never Three Putt" to all who have a golf story that represents the nature of Thanksgiving. I'm not looking for tales of conquer and submission, but rather want to know a story that symbolizes why you are thankful to have golf in your life.

I'll be collecting stories over the next week (expect to see this reposted as a reminder) and will post them throughout Thanksgiving Day.

Until then, be well.

Stories can be e-mailed to me directly at MichaelOtt23@gmail.com . . .

Photo(s): Thanksgiving

LPGA Tour 2010 Schedule Update (II)

The LPGA Tour's 2010's schedule of 23 events is down from 2009's 27 events, and 2008's 34 events.
Unveiled Tuesday night, here is the 2010 LPGA Tour Schedule (via: ESPN):

Feb. 18-21 -- Honda LPGA Championship (Thailand)
Feb. 25-28 -- HSBC Women's Champions (Singapore)
March 25-28 -- J Golf Classic (La Costa, Calif.)
April 1-4 -- Kraft Nabisco Championship
April 29-May 3 -- Corona Championship (Mexico)
May 10-16 -- Bell Micro LPGA Classic (Alabama)
June 10-13 -- State Farrm Classic (Illinois)
June 17-20 -- ShopRite Classic (Atlantic City)
June 24-27 -- Wegman's LPGA Championship
July 1-4 -- Jamie Farr Owens Corning (Toledo)
July 8-11 -- U.S. Women's Open (Oakmont)
July 22-25 -- Evian Masters (France)
July 29-Aug. 1 -- Ricoh Women's British Open (Royal Birkdale)
Aug. 20-22 -- Safeway Classic (Pumpkin Ridge, Ore)
Aug. 26-29 -- CN Canadian Women's Open
Sept. 10-12 -- P&G Beauty NW Arkansas Championship
Sept. 30-Oct. 3 -- Acapulco LPGA Classic (Mexico)
Oct. 7-10 -- Navistar LPGA Classic (Alabama)
Oct. 14-17 -- CVS/pharmacy LPGA Challenge (California)
Oct. 28-31 -- China
Nov. 4-7 -- Japan
Nov. 11-14 -- Lorena Ochoa Invitational (Mexico)
Nov. 18-21 -- LPGA Tour Championship

My questions are:

- As I suggested (not to pat myself on the back, although I will), is the Oct. 28-31 event scheduled in China going to be the Ladies Asian Golf Tour's Suzhou Taihu Ladies Open, scheduled for the same date in China?
- Why would the LPGA want to schedule an event in Thailand the week before the Thailand Ladies Open?
- Is the Nov. 4-7 event going to be the LPGA of Japan's Mizuno Classic -- which was scheduled for the same weekend in 2009?

 As Jason Sobel (ESPN.com) pointed out on his twitter feed:

@JasonSobel More on LPGA sked: Those 24 events take place over 40 weeks. Good news? Time to overcome jetlag. Bad news? Momentum is a thing of the past.

While a schedule spread out over so many weeks will definitely affect the practice and preparation schedules for many on the LPGA Tour, it may prove to be more lucrative in the long run. Frequently, professional golfers (PGA & LPGA) will make appearances at corporate outings throughout the country -- put on a clinic, maybe play with a group, give a speech afterwards. The open schedule definitely allows for more of this, which I happen to be an adamanet supporter of. To be honest, LPGA Tour players are more friendly than the PGA Tour guys. They are, quite simply, better at corporate outing gig than their male contemporaries. I hope that the women jump at this opportunity.

In terms of golf performance, the spread out schedule will be difficult for some. Some professionals prefer to play nearly every week (Dana Quiqley comes to mind) as a means to keep their game sharp, while others (like Tiger/Nicklaus) prefer to take time off between events to practice and prepare. Fortunately, these are the best women in the world and they will adapt.

Beth Ann Baldry (Golfweek) wrote an excellent piece on the 2010 Schedule.

LPGA 2010 Schedule Update I

Thanks to Wisconsin Reader for pointing this out.

LPGA's 2010 Schedule: 24 Events, 11 Foreign by Gene Yusada

International events continue to increase their influence on the schedule, a result of greater overseas demand for the LPGA and a smaller number of total events. Of the 24 tournaments, 11 – nearly half – will be staged outside of the U.S. As recently as this year, LPGA officials have said they prefer international events to account for one-third of the tour’s schedule.

But in a depressed U.S. economy where title sponsors are hard to come by, the LPGA had little choice but to seize global opportunities. Though critics likely will focus on the diminished schedule overall, a case could be made that the tour saved more U.S. events than expected. Of the eight tournaments that had title-sponsorship contracts expiring this year, five renewed their deals. The three exceptions: LPGA Corning Classic, Michelob Ultra Open at Kingsmill and Sybase Classic are gone.

The LPGA, however, still has work to do. Three events on the calendar – one in China, another in South Korea and the LPGA Tour Championship – have not yet announced their sponsors nor tournament sites.

This sounds similar to the plan that Annika Sorenstam suggested and I followed up with earlier this week.

Legends of Print (#3)

With the third installment of "Legends of Print," I introduce the "greatest golf writer in history," Mr. O.B. Keeler.

This photograph speaks volumes greater than I ever could; Mr. Robert Jones (left) with Mr. O.B. Keeler (right) and Mr. Jones' 1930 grand slam trophies.

An excellent article from 2007 by Sports Illustrated's John Garrity about Mr. O.B. Keeler.

From a 1924 article published in The American Golfer:

Returning with a degree from Harvard University toward the middle of February, Bobby Jones brought home to Atlanta along with a considerable portion of classical education a new engineering idea in the matter of long-range golf clubs which he has lately put into practical execution, somewhat over the protest of his friend and mentor, Stewart Maiden, who at the outset declared himself briefly but firmly as distinctly not in favor of his star pupil's departure from the accepted and established form and make of such implements. In a word, while at Cambridge, in the interludes of battling with Cicero against the iniquitous Cataline, and other scholastic problems, Bobby hauled out his old drawing instruments, used at the Georgia School of Technology, and made a set of drawings for a pair of wood clubs which, I am convinced, are unlike any the ancient game has yet produced. I understand that when Mr. Maiden got his first glimpse of the prodigious heads of these golf clubs, made to Bobby's design by A. G. Spalding and Bros., he expressed the opinion that if they represented truly the mechanical inclination of Bobby's mind, he (Bobby) would better have omitted the mechanical engineering course at Tech and have gone to Harvard in the first place.

As a proponent of wood clubs with large heads and faces, the writer cannot but feel eminently gratified by this expression of the American open champion's ideas. Certainly these new clubs have large heads and ample faces—the largest and amplest I have ever seen; larger, I feel sure, than the largest of the original Dreadnoughts designed and executed by the diminutive and original Benny Sayers some fifteen or twenty years ago. And it must be said that with the new weapons Mr. Jones is achieving results in his rounds at East Lake and Druid Hills; he is hitting a tremendous length from the tee and through the green, on the infrequent occasions when his drive leaves him a full clout with the wood to get home. The trend of recent years has been away from the small, compact heads and short faces, of which there was an epidemic some years ago among the manufacturers—for what reason the writer never has been able to figure out, unless it was easier to get smaller suitable chunks of persimmon than large ones. It may be recalled that three years ago I wrote for The American Golfer an almost tearful protest against this fad, which was positively afflicting the golfing laity and the beginners at the game, who knew no better than to buy and essay to use what was on the market. I said then that the small head with the small face made a hard game harder; and directed attention to the fact that most of the great golfers, both amateur and professional —but especially professional— employed wood clubs with heads ofgood size and plenty of hitting surface, citingHarry Vardon, Abe Mitchell and George Duncan as particular examples. Bobby never fell for the small-head fad. Indeed, he had his clubs made with faces deeper and deeper, until the driver he was using at Inwood, when he won the open championship, had a face nearly two inches in depth, though quite narrow at the sole.

The driver and brassie he now is using, of his own design, are of a size almost colossal. I am informed that they were even larger, as they came from the factory to the shop of Stewart Maiden, where heads and shafts were to be assembled; and that there were words—short, strong Caledonian words—heard in that shop before the clubs were duly put together. Indeed, there was a compromise; I am told that fully an eighth of an inch was taken from the club-heads in every direction before they finally were spliced to the beautiful bamboo shafts, by the old method of a "scared" joint. The first time I saw the clubs I told Bobby the heads really ought to be stream-lined, to lessen the air resistance in the swing. They give that impression. If you will pick out the largest of your wood clubs and compare the measurements with the following, of Bobby's new driver, you will gain something of an idea as to the expansiveness of his design. The face, with only enough loft to enable the player to see the lower edge with the club grounded— practically no loft at all—is 1 9/16 inches in depth, three inches long at the top, and 1½ inches long at the sole. The head measures 3 inches across the top at the widest point, front to back. The bulge is so emphatic that a line drawn across the top of the head from one extremity of the face to the other will show a protuberance of 3/8 inch at the middle of the rounded hitting surface.


I can get with conventional clubs, and the ball has much more life and run after it takes the turf. In other words, the tendency to 'climb' by a ball hit with much backspin seems to be almost obviated. Hit in the back with this club, the ball seems rather to bore its way through the air and to retain considerable running ability on landing. I think it will be a good club for use in a hard wind. I find also that I can hit as hard as I please without the 'climbing' tendency taking length off the shot." Two well-established theories are found supporting this idea—that backspin causes the ball to climb, and that a deep face tends to keep the ball down. How Bobby reconciles the equal carry of the ball hit with the new club with that from the older weapons, with backspin, I do not profess to explain. I fancy he simply swats it harder. Of course it is obvious that only the most accurate swing can be relied on to hit the ball regularly "in the back" from so lofty a tee; similar ambitions by anyone but an expert would meet with blue ruin in disastrous proportion. Bobby has an exceedingly accurate swing; it requires that to take the highteed ball exactly at the start of the upward motion of the club, and not smother it with the unlofted face. The plan may not be original; I think Walter Hagen tried out something very like it two years ago. But the design of the clubs, and their heroic size, will stamp this latest endeavor at least as distinctive, and Bobby's further experimentation will be watched with considerable interest. face—the most startling bulge I ever saw on a golf club. The driver weighs 13½ ounces, of which 7½ ounces are in the head and 6 ounces in the shaft; radical departure from the old proportions in wood clubs, which usually had the weight of head and shaft approximately equal. This significant change was made possible by the bamboo shaft, which is lighter in proportion to its stiffness than a hickory shaft. In fact, a friend of Bobby's, having one of the sample club-heads made up with a hickory shaft, found that the resultant club was so heavy that no lead could be used in the head. Very little lead is used in the head of Bobby's driver; only three-quarters of an ounce, in cylindrical form, half an inch in diameter, set directly back of the correct point of impact and extending three-quarters of an inch into the head. The length of the club over all is 44 inches. The bamboo shaft is stiff, yet there is a bit of "feel" to it. "So heavy a club needs to be 'felt' for timing the swing," Bobby explains. "I think if I got a hickory shaft light enough to enable me to 'feel' the head, it would have too much whip. I don't believe a hickory shaft of six ounces could be found or made that would have backbone enough to stand up under the fast swing of a club like this." And now the effect of this remarkable combination, with the celebrated Jones string. Bobby's own theory follows: "I tee the ball about three-quarters of an inch high and try to hit it directly 'in the back.' This stroke, with a deep-faced club with practically no loft, seems to give me as long a carry.

Also, how amazing is this . . . A letter sent from O.B. Keeler to Walter Hagen on the 25th Anniversary of his 1914 U.S. Open victory.

It is difficult to read, so I transcribed it below:


My dear Walter:
After all, it was Alexandre Dumas who could have come nearest to doing justice to this Silver Anniversary of your first winning of the United States Open Championship, August 21, 1914. And M. Dumas might have well titled it, "Twenty-five Years After."

My dear Walter, it's not only to a geat champion and the greatest competitor that I take the hat off my graying old bean; it's to the gentleman and the sportsman who for the span of more than a quarter of a centrury has been playing the game -- playing the game of life as well as the game of golf. And in congratulating you, I'm congratulating these games, both of them, and also myself, in being lucky enough to know you. A thousand friends will be telling you that, on this Silver Anniversary, but none who means it more sinceerly and affectionately than
         Your faithful friend and admierer,
                    O.B. Keeler

Photo(s): Bobby Jones, O.B. Keeler letter,

Thanksgiving Day Post Preview

Friends,

While I'm typically of the school that Thanksgiving only presents an opportunity to drink massive amounts of wine and consume absurd amounts of food before 3:00p.m., I'd like to open "Never Three Putt" to all who have a golf story that represents the nature of Thanksgiving. I'm not looking for tales of conquer and submission, but rather want to know a story that symbolizes why you are thankful to have golf in your life.

I'll be collecting stories over the next week (expect to see this reposted as a reminder) and will post them throughout Thanksgiving Day.

Until then, be well.

Stories can be e-mailed to me directly at MichaelOtt23@gmail.com . . .

Photo(s): Thanksgiving

Tuesday Reader . . .

A look at what my contemporaries, and superiors, have done.

So, sit back, listen to these and think about these . . .

Johnny Nash - Ooh Baby You've Been Good to Me (Via: Armed Snobbery)



Milton Wright - Keep it Up (Via: Armed Snobbery)

John Maginnes -- "Success Often Comes with a Steep Price Tag" 

When it comes to sports, the opposite of passion and love (the most overused word in English, by the way) is not hate. The opposite of love in sports is apathy. You don't win the career grand slam and have a hall-of-fame career if you are apathetic. That is why I want to read Agassi's book—there had to be a time in his nearly 20 years of professional tennis where it was the most important thing in his life. I am guessing that he suffered a bit of the David Duval syndrome. David reached the height of his profession, grabbing the No. 1 spot in the world ranking, looked around and asked the question: "Is this all there is?"

I knew David before he became No. 1. I remember being at his house in Florida one afternoon. After a day spent on the practice range, he continued his offseason routine with a workout and I decided to join him. By the time David's workout was over I had long since finished mine, showered, had a snack and was on my third beer. And I was more than satisfied with the work that I had put in that day. I had been on TOUR for a few years and had found my own routine, but I discovered that day there were people like David whose entire existence was consumed with the art of becoming the best. And that existence comes with a price tag only guys like David and Andre know.

Jason Sobel -- Q & A "For Sorenstam, it's all about life after golf"

Q: When you stopped playing on the LPGA, you said you didn't want to use the R word, meaning retirement. Is that still the case?

A: Yeah, I said, "I'm stepping away," and the reason is because, like you said, you never know. I'm lucky in that if I wanted to come back, I could. But I'm very content with where I am today and what I'm doing and all the businesses and family life. So today I have no plans whatsoever, but things change. In five years? I don't know. I certainly don't have the desire to go out there and grind, and that's what it takes. There are times when I wish I had that motivation, because then I would be out there. But with all this other fun stuff, there's more to life than golf. I'm glad that I've found other things in life and can enjoy a different chapter. 

Q: What drives you to these other pursuits? Is it money? Passion? Boredom relief?

A: Well, it's passion. And, you know, I'm competitive. I love the challenges that business gives me. It's different than on the golf course; on the course, it's hitting a 7-iron or making a putt or competing against the best in the world. Here it's different, but my goal is to get the Annika brand out there. If you look at other athletes, some have been very successful in creating businesses after athletic careers, but a lot of them are men. I can't think of a female athlete who has really done that. There have been many who were extremely good in their own field and have done some things around their sport, but no one's really ventured out into different areas. I'm really curious as to why that is. I love what I do and therefore I spend a lot of time on it and want to succeed. 

Jason Sobel -- Q & A "For Wie, balance plays important role in life" 

Q: After clinching the win, you had beer poured on you by the other players on the 18th green.

A: Yeah, they did.

Q: You're not 21 yet. Are you going to get in trouble with the LPGA?

A: No, what happens in Mexico stays in Mexico. It was just really cool. You see it on TV; whenever somebody wins, players pour beer all over them. It was one of those things where I always wanted that to happen. 

Q: You keep talking about being happy. What makes you happiest? Is it winning golf tournaments? Your family life? Being with friends? All of the above?

A: I think it's a combination of everything. It's a balance. My friends definitely make me happy; my family definitely makes me happy; winning golf tournaments definitely makes me happy. It's just a little reward that I get, knowing that I put in the long hours, just the gratitude and the relief, everything that I feel.
When the hard work pays off, it just feels so great. And then, having another life, going to Stanford makes me so happy. I can't even put it into words. I love going to school. I love having a normal life, going to football games, going to basketball games, going out to eat with my friends. I love the balance that I have in my life. I've got a good mix of everything.

Jason Sobel -- "After first win, Wie headed in right direction" 

"Wie first burst onto the scene as a precocious 13-year-old, finishing in a share of ninth place at the year's first women's major, but it was her inclusion at the 2004 Sony Open that vaulted her into the role of global phenomenon. Playing against the world's best male golfers, she posted rounds of 68-72 at her hometown event, failing to make the cut by a single stroke.
In a society that thrives on underdog stories, in a generation that values diversity and culture, the youngster should have been considered the game's most exciting prospect in years. And she was ... for a while.

A funny thing happened to her, though, on the road to superstardom, and perhaps just as importantly, likability. Wie turned professional at age 16. She was handed millions of dollars from sponsors Nike and Sony. She was awarded sponsors' exemptions to events on men's tours. She was hailed by the media as the female version of Tiger Woods. She was given everything she asked for. And much, much more.

Through injuries and swing changes, close calls and major whiffs, she seemed to regress on the course, eclipsed by other young peers who were winning important tournaments. That's when the public backlash against her really began, when pure malice for a teenaged girl became commonplace, when the world started hating Michelle Wie."

Matt Ginella - "USGA Encouraged By Visit to Erin Hills" 

Ziegler, 52, is a Wisconsin native who runs an investment firm that reportedly has multi-billions of dollars in assets. He carries a 6-handicap, and his favorite courses are San Francisco Golf Club, Cypress Point and Augusta National.

Despite the upbeat meet-and-greet with USGA brass, Ziegler won’t discuss the possibility of hosting an Open. He will only talk about two specific goals: “I want to get the course in terrific condition, and I want to make sure it’s ready for the Amateur in 2011.”

Ziegler’s doing so by increasing the maintenance budget, building a state-of-the-art maintenance shed, purchasing the proper equipment and increasing the size of the crew. The 10th hole is being converted from a par 5 to a par 4, which will reduce total par from 73 to 72. He’s addressing a drainage issue on the 17th, and architects Mike Hurdzan and Dana Fry have begun doing away with some of the 103 bunkers that were added in the last 10 months.

The new owner says he didn’t invest in Erin Hills to make a profit. “I realize it has enormous potential,” says Ziegler, “but I didn’t buy into it to make money. I wouldn’t have advised anyone to buy into the golf industry right now. But it’s the intersection of my enjoyment for the game, and it’s good for the area. In a small way, it’s my way of giving back to golf.”

Erin Hills is closed for the winter. And it might remain that way until late summer. Ziegler says the target date for reopening is Aug. 1. “But if it’s not ready, we won’t open,” he says. And he’s willing to keep it closed all year if necessary. He wants the course ready for the Amateur.

When the course does open, Ziegler says the fee will be $160; it will be walking only, he’ll decrease the number of tee times from five per hour to four per hour to ease stress on the grass and speed up play. “We will be ready,” says Ziegler, “but there’s a lot of work to be done.” 

Steve Elling - "Barron case reveals conflicts, mistakes in testing issue"

"One of Barron's attorneys said Friday that in several instances, tour players have tested positive this year for recreational street drugs, which are not subject to the same penalties as performance-enhancing doses. The tour argues that a player smoking pot, of course, is not seeking a potential advantage since it's not a performance-enhancing drug. 

Plenty of rumors have circulated this year about positive tests -- Barron's attorney offered no names or first-hand knowledge to support his claim -- but if the case continues in court, the tour could be asked to give an account. Earlier this season at the one-year anniversary of testing, tour commissioner Tim Finchem said that while no positive tests for steroids had turned up, he did not deny that players had tested positive for recreational drugs.

The tour has repeatedly declined to name those players and Finchem, in a jarring conflict of interest that has been decried several times, has complete latitude to dispense punishment for recreational-drug use as he sees fit. In other words, he can do next to nothing and nobody but the offending player would know the nature of the sanction. The tour has never announced fines for disciplinary actions, another frequent point of criticism."

And, an excerpt from my interview with Alistair Tait of Golfweek:

"I lament the death of the golf essay. One of the first books I ever read was by Herbert Warren Wind. I remember reading Thomas Boswell's Strokes of genius and falling in love with the game all over again. I also grew up reading Peter Dobereiner, loving the sheer craft of the man and his grasp of the game and the written word. Dan Jenkins' take on the majors was also required reading too, even if it came weeks after the close of the championship. He always had something original and witty to say, always highlighted an aspect others hadn't seen.

Sadly, the days of sitting down with a good golf essay, or long Dobereiner like piece on the eccentricities of the game are long gone. It seems these days that if you can't reduce your observations to 140 characters or less then no one will read you."

Photo(s): Charles Barkley

Tiger = Professional Javelin Thrower

At the Australian Masters on Saturday, Tiger had a . . . well, temper tantrum on the 13th tee box.

Via: PGA of Australia

Woods played down an incident on the 13th tee where his driver ended up in the gallery after a wayward drive.
"I was spinning the ball quite a bit with the driver today and I didn't quite have it right," he said. "On 13 it was my mistake there, I got hot after a bad tee shot and let go of the club."

Throughout his career, Tiger has had a history of showing his emotions, which are often unpleasant, on the course.

Obviously, it would be inappropriate to excuse Tiger's actions, but they should at least be presented within context.

There is not something afoul in Tiger Woods-land. Tiger Woods is receiving unprecedented stardom from golf; he's positioning himself as one of the quintessential global icons of our time. Not only did he recently establish himself as the world's first athlete billionaire, not only will he likely eclipse all essential golf records within the next few years, not only is he the best golfer in the world and seemingly the most dominant athlete today, but he's one of the most influential, visible, and recognizable figures in the world.

"One day, when Tiger was just a kid, he was throwing his clubs around in a fuming fit when his dad said something like "Tiger, golf is supposed to be fun." And Tiger said, "Daddy, I want to win. That's how I have fun.""

Tiger does obviously need to be aware of his behavior because he is such an influential figure. But, ultimately, it is Tiger's temperament, his tightly-wound personality, and his unquestionable driving temperament that has made him the greatest ever. Tiger seems to expect more from himself than his peers; he openly states that, when he arrives on the first tee on Thursdays, he expects, not believes, not hopes, but EXPECTS to win.

I hope in the future that Tiger will curb his temper. As someone who has been unprecedentedly influenced by Tiger Woods in his golf and as someone who has witnessed (and, at times, participated in) the immature behavior, cattiness, and volatility that is junior golf, Tiger does need to accept his platform as golf's leading role-model.

However, I'm always willing to give the man a break as he keeps winning, keeps serving as a sports paradigm both on and off the course, and keeps doing this . . .

Play peacefully, not violently . . .

-Michael

A plan for the success of the LPGA Tour

Yesterday I listened to Annika Sorenstam on ESPN's "On The Tee" podcast (11/10) with Jason Sobel.

Their interview touches on a number of LPGA Tour specific issues. Most interesting was Jason's question about the future of the Tour:

Jason: Is the future of the tour that of a more global tour (Japan, Korea, Mexico)?
Annika: Yes, we should be more global. Have more tournaments around the world. That is where the demand is, companies are more interested in Europe and Asia.

After thinking about it for sometime, here is a plan for the future success of the LPGA Tour as an international tour.

Here's the situation (via: Golfweek)

Of this year’s 16 scheduled U.S. tournaments (excluding majors), 13 – at best – will return for the 2010 schedule. Three events already are defunct: Turtle Bay (formerly SBS Open), Kapalua LPGA Classic and LPGA Corning Classic.

At least seven of these events have title-sponsorship contracts expiring this year. Among this group, tournament owners of the Sybase Classic, P&G Beauty NW Arkansas Championship and Navistar LPGA Classic are optimistic about continuing in 2010.

At least four are under contract through at least 2010: Safeway Classic, CVS/pharmacy LPGA Challenge (name changed following acquisition of Longs Drugs), Bell Micro LPGA Classic and Tour Championship.

The LPGA is launching a new event in Southern California next year with J Golf, the tour’s Korean cable TV partner. In addition, LPGA State Farm Classic has committed to return.

On the international front, the tour announced July 21 the creation of another tournament in Mexico beginning in 2010: the Acapulco LPGA Classic, to be held next spring at Tres Vidas Golf Club. Two of the LPGA’s three existing events in Mexico are up for renewal this year: MasterCard Classic and Corona Championship. MasterCard’s status is uncertain; Corona hasn’t officially committed, but event organizers have expressed confidence the event will continue. The third event, Lorena Ochoa Invitational, is under contract through 2012.

In addition, the Evian Masters’ contract expires in 2009, but a tournament official said "all the lights are green for a renewal." Tour officials also said Honda LPGA Thailand and CN Canadian Women’s Open are part of the 2010 schedule.

As has been illustrated over the past few weeks throughout the golf media, the LPGA Tour is facing a dire financial situation as corporate affiliations are disappearing and general interest in the Tour is dwindling.

Of the 29 Tournaments listed on the 2009 LPGA Tour Schedule, foreign title sponsors of note:

SBS - Korea based
Honda - Japan based
HSBC - England based
Corona - Mexico based
Societe Generale - France based
RICOH - Japan based
CN - Canada based
Samsung - Korea based
Hana Bank -Korea based
Mizuno - Japan based
Banamex - Mexico
Rolex - Switzerland based

American based: Nextel, Mirassou Winery, Kraft Nabisco, Michelob, Sybase/ShopRite, Corning, State Farm, McDonalds/Coca-Cola, Wegmans, Kroger, US Open (no title sponsor), Solheim Cup (no title sponsor), Safeway/Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Navistar/Monaco RV, Wendy's.

The current Rolex Women's World Golf Rankings (11/09/09):
Of the top-30:
       Korean: 9
       American: 7
       European: 6
       Japanese: 5
       Australian: 2

With the evident international interest and international presence on the LPGA Tour, there is an obvious opportunity for the LPGA Tour to exploit their international advantage.

While there is an international interest in women's golf, it's important to note that the purse sizes on the Ladies European Tour approximately average €300,000 ($500,000) while every LPGA Tour purse was over $1 million, with many over $2 million.

My  proposal would be to follow a men's European Tour model where there is no clear base-country for the Tour. Unlike the European Tour, obviously, an international LPGA Tour would have a multi-contintent schedule.

The LPGA Tour schedule would be comprised of the most successful American tournaments, the title-sponsored events with foreign corporations would be moved to those respective countries (something those corporations would hardly have an issue with), and the LPGA schedule would then be joined with the most successful tournaments from the Ladies European Tour and the Ladies Asian Golf Tour (the 2010 schedule has four events: China, Indonesia, India, and Thailand).


Obviously, this would create a traveling burden on the players, but I believe that increased incomes via tournament purses and international corporate affiliations would be make up for it.

The mission statement for the LPGA Tour reads: "To inspire, empower, education and entertain by showcasing the best professionals in the world -- The members of the LPGA. To be a leader in the world of sports and to promote economic empowerment for our members. We will also serve as role models on and off the course."

While an international tour would make it more difficult for American players to have an arena to compete, it's always been my understanding that professional sports are meant to provide an arena for, simply put, the best to compete. While there is an obvious xenophobia about the LPGA Tour, it is a misguided notion to believe that its purpose is to house American female golfers.

The LPGA needs to go to a more stringent international schedule or they will continue to face economic instability. Particularly, as it seems that many American corporations are going to cut down on wasteful spending (I'm not labeling LPGA Tour affiliations as wasteful, but rather implying that there are, perhaps, better uses of that money) it seems unlikely that corporations will be adamant about maintaining their title sponsorships.

Jason also asked Annika if the LPGA Tour needs another dominant figure (as she was) or if it would be better served by having a core-group of 20 players who compete well with each other week in week out. Annika's response was noncommital, but she did point out that during her time some criticized the tour and labeled it as boring because she was winning all of the time.

On a side note, I interviewed Jason Sobel last week for a project on the future of golf journalism and golf media. Obviously, he was incredibly well informed, but, most importantly, he was kind and generous to offer me so much time late in the evening -- our conversation lasted until after midnight.

I encourage my readers to follow him (at his ESPN blog) and the work that he does; not only is he setting the quo for the future of online golf media (which, frankly, is the future of golf journalism), but today he is doing great work and providing great insight.

Photo(s): LPGA Tour

Stop hating on Phil. . .

Jason Sobel, who I will be interviewing tomorrow, blogged yesterday about the potential Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson rivalry which may unfold this year:

"That leaves Mickelson, one of the most accomplished players in the game's history who often receives criticism simply for the fact that he isn't Tiger Woods. At his best, though, Lefty can hang with his adversary on any given Sunday, as evidenced by victories at the Tour Championship two months ago and the WGC-HSBC Champions tournament this past weekend in China."


"He has now finished off the 2009 campaign playing his best golf since winning back-to-back titles at the BellSouth Classic and Masters three-and-a-half years ago, if not the best golf of his career. Thanks to assistance with the forward-press putting stroke from two-time major winner Dave Stockton, Mickelson is rolling his rock with the utmost confidence -- something he can only hope remains during the offseason."


Though many are quick to criticize Mickelson, he truly has been Tiger's most formidable opponent throughout the last decade. While he's battled inconsistency, off-the-course circumstances, and a seeming reputation as one who folds under pressure, he continues to prove his mastery at times.


But, there are a few certainties about Mickelson which the golfing community fails to fully acknowledge:


1) Mickelson is every bit as physically talented as any one to have ever played the game. (Here, Here, or Here). He has an uncanny sense for trickery and short-game mastery -- although, interestingly, his technique is noticeably different to that of Woods (Tiger v. Phil).


2) Mickelson's golf career has been filled with as much success as almost anyone in history. 


College/Amateur - (won 16 college events, 1990 Porter Cup, 4-time first-team All American, 3 NCAA Individual Champions, 3 Haskins  Awards, 1990 US Amateur, Won 1991 PGA Tour event as an amateur)


Professional (45 wins, 3 majors)


3) His game is better today than it ever has been. . . 


A few years ago I spoke with a friend and former teammate of Mickelson's at Arizona State. Ironically, we had dinner the night that Mickelson lost the U.S. Open at Winged Foot.


**Phil's 18th debacle starts at the 3:30 mark.

Phil's former teammate spoke of how even in college Phil had tendencies to play overly brash at the end of competition. My favorite anectode from the night concerned Phil's idea of shaping shots. When trying to either draw or fade a ball, the major focus needs to be in three regards: one) what line does the shot need to start on, two) what line do I want the ball to end up curving to, and three) is it more essential to start the ball on line and over/under curve the shot (say, when trying to curve it out of trees and you want to make certain that you don't hit a tree) or to make certain that the shot curves in its intended direction (say, when curving the ball away from a hazard).


Phil, as evident in the 18th hole at Winged Foot (and, truthfully, throughout his career) has struggled with this at times, perhaps focusing too much on executing the "perfect shot."


As a junior golfer, I was fortunate to attend a banquet for the 2004 U.S. Open which featured Arnold Palmer, Phil Mickelson, and was hosted by Jim Nantz (I blogged about it last month). While in the audience, I was offered an opportunity to ask Phil and Mr. Palmer a question. I asked them to comment on their shared aggressive playing style -- this was during the time that Tiger was battling off the tee (not that he still doesn't at times) and was playing with unbelievable conservatism. Phil made a joke, and Palmer told a wonderful story. Obviously, I find ways to tell that story often -- but I'm always certain to include that Phil was a true gentleman. I attended the banquet because Rolex, who hosted it, had invited the top juniors from the area (AJGA members). Phil, who has the most decorated AJGA career in history, spoke directly to a group of us candidly and sincerely -- he told us how he had never believed that he would accomplish all that he had and that one of us would one day play against him on Tour.


As someone with a vested intrinsic interest in Tiger Wood's history breaking career, at times I want Phil to come into his own for no purpose other than providing Tiger with that single formidable opponent which some overzealous commentators seem to use as a condemnation of Tiger's greatness.


Look forward to this PGA season. Tiger is going to be better this year than he ever has before, as will Phil, there's a generation of young players who are blossoming, and there's the old guard that isn't ready to go silently into the night.


-Michael


P.S. Check out Geoff Shackelford's excellent post on Tiger Woods and his golf course design business.
Photo(s):